Project Data Sheets (PDS) contain summary information on the project or program: Because the PDS is a work in progress, some information may not be included in its initial version but will be added as it becomes available. Information about proposed projects is tentative and indicative.
|PDS Creation Date||07 May 2010|
|PDS Updated as of||09 Feb 2015|
|Project Name||Transport Sector Development Project|
|Geographical Location||Solomon Islands|
|In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of, or reference to, a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.|
|Subsector||Transport policies and institutional development|
|Strategic Agendas||Environmentally sustainable growth (ESG)
Inclusive economic growth (IEG)
|Drivers of Change||Gender equity and mainstreaming (GEM)
Governance and capacity development (GCD)
|Gender Equity and Mainstreaming Categories||Category 2: Effective gender mainstreaming (EGM)|
|Type/Modality of Assistance||Approval Number||Source of Funding||Approved Amount (thousand)|
|Grant||0243||Asian Development Fund||12,000|
|Technical Assistance||7715||Japan Fund for Poverty Reduction||800|
For more information about the safeguard categories, please see http://www.adb.org/site/safeguards/safeguard-categories
Given the subprojects prioritized in the NTP, civil works are not likely to result in any significant adverse environmental impact, and potential environmental impacts can be adequately mitigated and monitored. An environmental assessment and review framework presents the general anticipated environmental impacts of the sector project, selection criteria, and environmental procedures for future subprojects. An initial environmental examination incorporating an environmental management and monitoring plan was prepared for each of the two sample subprojects for road and airstrip rehabilitation. The project is classified as environment category B.
The project is not expected to entail significant resettlement impacts, as anticipated subprojects will involve existing infrastructure and rehabilitation works can be undertaken within the existing right-of-way or on land owned by the government. While the sample subprojects studied do not require land acquisition, some subsequent subprojects or activities may involve minor land acquisition and resettlement impacts, which can be identified only during implementation. If such impacts are identified, the government will prepare resettlement plans for such subprojects according to the resettlement framework for the project. The project s involuntary resettlement classification is category B.
Melanesians are the native people of Solomon Islands and comprise the vast majority of the population. The project is not expected to have any negative impact on indigenous peoples. While a separate indigenous peoples plan is not needed, all project components or subprojects will be implemented in a culturally appropriate and participatory manner to meet the needs of the population. The project s indigenous peoples classification is category C.
To develop the TA design, ADB and project preparatory TA consultants held workshops and meetings to invite stakeholders' inputs. The stakeholders include the Solomon Islands Government and development partners.
|During Project Design
ADB consulted with the Solomon Islands Government and development partners, including AusAID, European Commission, JICA, New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, and World Bank, to develop project design during the implementation of a project preparatory technical assistance and a fact-finding mission. PPTA team visited two sample subproject areas (i.e., St. Martin Road in Honiara and Gizo airstrip) and consulted with peoples in the areas to analyze environment, and poverty and social issues.
|During Project Implementation
|The project will improve access to socioeconomic opportunities by rehabilitating and maintaining land, sea, and air transport infrastructure. Solomon Islands has been offered significant parallel grant cofinancing from the governments of Australia and New Zealand but has insufficient capacity to plan and implement the necessary civil works. The project will therefore strengthen transport sector institutions by establishing a central project implementation unit (CPIU) to reform the government's institutional structure, implement civil works, and conduct technical and managerial capacity development. In doing so, the project will prepare an environment for a comprehensive transport sector-based approach based on long-term partnerships, sector coordination, and reliance on government systems. Through close cooperation with other development partners, the project will support the government in efficiently implementing all externally funded assistance to the transport sector.|
|The economy is at a disadvantage given the dispersed population, limited resources, and relatively high cost of providing remote communities with the infrastructure and basic services to stimulate productivity gains. The urban rural divide is increasing between the population living in and around the capital city of Honiara and the majority of the population living in rural communities on outer islands. The weak and poorly maintained transport infrastructure constrains economic growth and limits its inclusiveness. Improved transport infrastructure is expected to strengthen growth, improve access to basic social services in rural areas, build rural economies, and increase geographic equity.|
|The people of Solomon Islands have improved access to socioeconomic opportunities.|
|Description of Outcome
MID provides sustainable transport infrastructure.
|Progress Towards Outcome
The project is reported as 84% complete as of the end of 2014.
|Description of Project Outputs
The central project implementation unit (CPIU) provides efficient and effective project implementation and management. Transport infrastructure prioritized in the National Transport Plan (NTP) is rehabilitated and maintained. MID's technical and managerial capacity is sufficient.
|Status of Implementation Progress (Outputs, Activities, and Issues)
Target surpassed accounted for mainly by contracts for roads using LBES methods and through machine-based contracts. 6% [MID-CPIU only] and 29% [including consultants] Based on 2014 work plan and as of end Sep 2014: Roads [machine-based] - 30 contracts [210.3 km] at implementation stage; 7 contracts [58.7 km] at tendering, 12 contracts [148.2 km] planned. Roads [LBES] - 48 contracts [338.2 km] at implementation stage; 53 contracts [303.6 km] at tendering, 17 contracts [90.5 km] planned. Wharves: 6 at tendering stage, 1 on hold 21 out of 60 CPIU staff are female. 2,761 person-months, 50% female Roads: Based on 2014 and 2015 work plan: Machinebased, 15 contracts [105km] awarded, 10 contracts [63 km] at tendering, 7 contracts [115 km] planned. LBES, 55 contracts awarded [327km], 27 contracts [140 km] at tendering, 16 contracts [113 km] planned Wharves: 5 contracts [14 wharves] at tendering, 5 contracts [19 wharves] planned, 1 on hold Target surpassed at the end of 2013. All MID staff attended at least one training activity from project start to end 2013. Target surpassed at the end of 2013. 3 female MID staff received formal off the job training in at least one competency during Q2. An additional 3 female staff received on the job training during Q2. Contract for delivery of traiing for Certificate IV in civil construction supervision and material testing was awarded on 25 Sep 2014, in-country meeting scheduled in Oct 2014, and first training session in mid Nov 2014. On target. On target. Target was reduced from 15 to 10 at MTR. Contract for delivery of training in Certificate IV Civil Construction Supervision and Material Testing awarded on 25 Sep 2014, in-country meeting in Oct 2014 and first training session in Nov 2014. Target was reduced from 700 to 400 at MTR. 424 received workshop [106% of target], 19% women as of Dec 2014
|Status of Development Objectives
|Status of Operation / Construction
|Date of First Listing||2011 Jan 25|
The CPIU will be responsible for design and day-to-day implementation, financial management, monitoring and evaluation, and development and implementation of training. The CPIU will be established by mobilizing international and national consultants to support MID's existing technical and managerial capacity. Consulting firms will be retained for these services, in accordance with ADB's Guidelines on the Use of Consultants (2010, as amended from time to time). Throughout project implementation, international consultants will be tasked to strengthen the capacity of the CPIU through coaching and on-the-job training of government professional and technical staff and national consultants. Outline terms of reference are in the PAM. Procurement and disbursement for the services will follow ADB's policy and guidelines.
Procurement and disbursement for civil works and formal training programs to be financed by other development partners will follow government systems. MID will procure a number of packages for civil works and formal training programs through the government's procurement procedure, including central tender board, ministerial tender board, and accountable officer procedures. CPIU will assist MID in procuring and administering contracts. ADB's Safeguard Policy Statement (2009) will apply to all civil works. The implementation arrangements are summarized in the Project Administration Manual.
|Procurement and Consulting Notices
|Concept Clearance||11 Aug 2010|
|Fact-finding||12 Aug 2010 to 27 Aug 2010|
|Management Review Meeting||–|
|Approval||15 Dec 2010|
|Technical Assistance 7715||15 Dec 2010||01 Feb 2011||01 Feb 2011||28 Feb 2014||31 Dec 2015||–|
|Date||Approval Number||ADB (US$ thousand)||Others (US$ thousand)||Net Percentage|
|Cumulative Contract Awards|
|Approval Number||Approved Amount||Revised Amount||Total Commitment||Uncommitted Balance||Total Disbursement||Undisbursed Balance|
|Technical Assistance 7715||800||800||774||26||558||242|
Covenants are categorized under the following categories—audited accounts, safeguards, social, sector, financial, economic, and others. Covenant compliance is rated by category by applying the following criteria: (i) Satisfactory—all covenants in the category are being complied with, with a maximum of one exception allowed, (ii) Partly Satisfactory—a maximum of two covenants in the category are not being complied with, (iii) Unsatisfactory—three or more covenants in the category are not being complied with. As per the 2011 Public Communications Policy, covenant compliance ratings for Project Financial Statements apply only to projects whose invitation for negotiation falls after 2 April 2012.
|Sector||Social||Financial||Economic||Others||Safeguards||Project Financial Statements|
|Responsible ADB Officer||Rishi Ram Adhar (firstname.lastname@example.org)|
|Responsible ADB Department||Pacific Department|
|Responsible ADB Divisions||Pacific Liaison and Coordination Office in Sydney, Australia|
Ministry of Infrastructure Development
|List of Project Documents||http://www.adb.org/projects/41171-022/documents|